🔗 Share this article

The nation's controversial action to prohibit social networking access for those under 16 is sending ripples internationally. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and families are observing closely to see if this strategy will become a template for the rest of the world.

The European Trend

Across Europe, a rising number of nations are considering comparable bans.

• Denmark has stated a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the PM stating that mobile devices and networks are "stealing our kids' childhood". The policy may be passed next year.
• The Norwegian government is preparing to implement a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to protect children from the "power of the algorithms".
• Ireland is working on a digital ID system to confirm the age and identity of social media account holders. Officials have suggested that an Australian-model ban is "an tools under consideration".
• In Spain, the leader has urged the legislature to enact a bill lifting the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a related move, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has recommended guardians to prevent their youngsters from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the European parliament has adopted a non-binding resolution supporting a ban for under-16s except if guardian approval is granted. While it warns of the "compulsive" design of these apps, the step does not create binding law.

"A strong age limit is a solid starting point," stated one MEP supporting the measure.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Approach

In the UK, the leadership has kept open a potential ban, emphasizing that "no measure is being dismissed" but stressing any policy must be "supported by robust data".

Last year, momentum built behind a bill to enact limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually watered down. However, the administration vowed to further research the matter.

Advocacy groups have raised warnings. An organization established by the relatives of a young person who took her own life after being exposed to disturbing social media material contends that a strict age ban might not protect children and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of risk when young people turn 16.

"This ban is a response to the refusal of the tech sector to build platforms and apps that are appropriate and fit for children," stated a influential online safety campaigner.

The US: A Fragmented Approach

Stateside, legislation is primarily unfolding at the regional level due to federal inaction.

• Utah requires parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and limits overnight use.
• The state of Florida has passed a bill prohibiting children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has enacted a law capping under-16s to one hour of social media use per day, with extra access dependent on a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have also enacted bills requiring parental consent for minors to set up social media presences.

Despite bipartisan support and calls from some politicians to mimic the Australian example, a federal ban is right now seen as improbable.

International Outlook

Beyond these regions, additional states are likewise exploring options.

• The Malaysian government aims to ban social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the required age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, global agencies adopt a more measured position. A major UN agency has cautioned that social media bans have downsides and "could have unintended consequences". The organization highlights that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for isolated youth and that bans should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to improve safety.

While this worldwide debate evolves, the policies of this nation and its followers show that governments around the world are less and less content to delay for tech companies to act voluntarily.